|
|
公告如下：
-过度讨论规章制度的变化（在主持人结束主题时，177篇帖子中有47篇是关于该主题的），这造成了恐惧、不确定性和怀疑的气氛，鼓励了其他社区成员越来越多的情绪反应。后来的投票结果显示，81%的人支持最具争议的章程修改，这表明争议被夸大了。
-捍卫“反向种族主义”和“反向性别歧视”，这些概念没有经验证据的支持，可以被视为蓄意恐吓或创造排斥环境。
-使用潜在的冒犯性语言或诽谤，在一个案例中，甚至用同样的诽谤称20世纪70年代的SNL短剧“真的很有趣”，这表明对其他社区成员缺乏同情心。
-淡化工作场所性骚扰等敏感话题，这可能被解释为骚扰或创造一个不受欢迎的环境。
-随意提及涉及**的场景，这对某些观众来说可能是不合适的或触发的。
-讨论禁止或删除社区成员，这可能被视为未经许可发布私人信息。
-将他人不可接受的行为视为“神经分化”的特征，这是有问题的，因为它造成了一种刻板印象，即神经分化的人很难与之互动，需要特殊的治疗。
-过度讨论有争议的话题或过去的冲突，这可能被视为对社区讨论的持续干扰。
-使用潜在的冒犯性术语，即使是自我审查或间接提及的。
-对其他社区成员的动机和/或心理健康做出假设或猜测。
原文如下：
- Overloading the discussion of the bylaws change (47 out of 177 posts in topic at the time the moderators closed the topic), which created an atmosphere of fear, uncertainty, and doubt, which encouraged increasingly emotional responses from other community members. The later result of the vote showed 81% support for the most controversial of the bylaws changes, which demonstrates the controversy was blown out of proportion.
- Defending “reverse racism” and “reverse sexism”, concepts not backed by empirical evidence, which could be seen as deliberate intimidation or creating an exclusionary environment.
- Using potentially offensive language or slurs, in one case even calling an SNL skit from the 1970s using the same slur “genuinely funny”, which shows a lack of empathy towards other community members.
- Making light of sensitive topics like workplace sexual harassment, which could be interpreted as harassment or creating an unwelcoming environment.
- Casually mentioning scenarios involving sexual abuse, which may be inappropriate or triggering for some audiences.
- Discussing bans or removals of community members, which may be seen as publishing private information without permission.
- Dismissing unacceptable behavior of others as a “neurodivergent” trait, which is problematic because it creates a stereotype that neurodivergent people are hard to interact with and need special treatment.
- Excessive discussion of controversial topics or past conflicts, which could be seen as sustained disruption of community discussions.
- Use of potentially offensive terms, even when self-**ed or alluded to indirectly.
- Making assumptions or speculations about other community members’ motivations and/or mental health. |
|
